Start here
The Zest

Letting Someone Else Use Your Brand Without Losing It

Written by

"A friend wants to open a second location under my name. Can I just say yes?" You can say yes, but not just yes. Trademark law lets other people use your brand under a license, and their use can even count as yours. The condition is control: you have to actually oversee the nature and quality of what's sold under your name. Let someone use it with no oversight, and you can lose the mark.

Here's how that works, and what control looks like in real situations.

Why control is the whole point

A trademark tells customers that what they're buying comes from one source and will be what they've come to expect. That's the thing a license has to protect. The customer who walks into the second location, buys the collab candle or signs up for the licensed course is trusting your name. If the quality behind it is whatever someone else decides, the name stops meaning anything.

That's also why the rule isn't about whether the other person does good work. It's about whether you're the one deciding what the standard is.

What the law says

The Trademark Act allows a mark to be used by "related companies," and that use benefits the owner, as long as the mark isn't used to deceive the public. A related company is anyone whose use of the mark is controlled by the owner with respect to the nature and quality of the goods or services. Control is the definition.

The Act also defines abandonment, and it isn't limited to stopping use. A mark is abandoned when the owner's conduct, including what the owner fails to do, causes the mark to lose its significance as a mark. Letting others use a mark with no real control is the classic way that happens. Courts call it naked licensing. And a registration doesn't shield you: a petition to cancel a registration on the ground that the mark has been abandoned can be filed at any time.

What naked licensing looks like in court

The Ninth Circuit's Barcamerica decision is a well-known example. A company owned a federal registration for a wine brand and licensed it to a winery under agreements with no quality control provisions. Its oversight amounted to occasional, informal tastings and reliance on the reputation of the winery's winemaker. The court held that this was naked licensing and that the company had forfeited its rights in the mark, and it affirmed cancellation of the registration.

Two points from that decision are worth keeping. First, quality control doesn't require high quality, only that the owner plays a meaningful role in keeping quality consistent. Second, the court rejected the argument that the licensee's wine was good anyway. That wasn't the question. The question was whether the owner was controlling it.

The court also noted that formal provisions aren't always required, and that some courts have accepted a close working relationship, where the licensor knew and relied on the licensee's own quality efforts, as enough. That's an argument to make after a problem, not a plan to rely on before one.

Three common situations

A friend opens a second location. This feels like a favor, and that's the risk. If the new location sets its own menu or services, its own look and its own standards, all under your name, you have a naked license. Control here means written standards for what's offered, approval of signage and how your logo appears, the right to visit and inspect, and the right to pull the name if standards slip.

A collab product. Another brand puts your name on something they make. Your customers will assume you stand behind it. Control means approving the product and samples before launch, approving the packaging and any marketing that uses your mark, and a way to check that later production matches what you approved.

A licensed course or program. A coach or studio teaches your method under your name. Control means approved materials, a standard for who can teach it, approval of how your name and logo are used, and the right to review sessions or student feedback. A course is usually copyrighted material too, so make sure you own what you're licensing. If a contractor built part of it, ownership of that work isn't automatic.

In all three, the control has to be real and ongoing. A clause you never use doesn't do much more than no clause.

Putting it in writing

The license itself is a contract, and the contracts that protect your brand cover the agreement in more detail. From the trademark side, the terms that matter are written quality standards, approval rights over products and marketing, inspection or sample rights, rules for how the name and logo are displayed, a way to end the license if standards aren't met, and a clear statement that the licensee's use benefits you and gives them no ownership.

Then follow through. Ask for the samples. Visit. Review the marketing. Keep a simple file showing that you did. If anyone ever challenges your mark, that file is your evidence.

Done right, licensing strengthens your position rather than risking it. A controlled licensee's use benefits you, and under the statute, even the very first use of a mark can be made by someone else if the owner controls it. That matters when your registration has to be maintained with proof of continued use: use by a controlled licensee is use that counts for you.

If you're a Florida business about to let someone else use your name, you can see how the contract work and packages are priced on the services page, and the FAQs page answers most of what comes up before a first call.

Book a free 15-minute discovery call with the attorney (opens in a new tab)

(No legal advice is given on the discovery call. It's a chance to tell me what you're building and hear how the process works.)

Sources

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Start here