Start here
The Zest

I filed my own trademark and got an Office Action

Written by

Find the issue date, write down the deadline, and figure out which kind of letter you got before you do anything else. You have three months from the issue date to respond, one three-month extension is available for a $125 USPTO fee, and an attorney can step into your application as it stands without starting over.

Getting an Office Action on an application you filed yourself is common. It doesn't mean you did something unfixable. It does mean the next few weeks matter more than the months you've already waited.

First, confirm it's real

The USPTO emails Office Actions to the address on the application. Scammers send look-alike notices to the same inboxes, because applicant emails are public. Before you pay anyone or click anything, look up your serial number in the USPTO's own status system and check that the Office Action is listed there. I wrote about how the fakes work in the article on fake USPTO notices.

If it's on the USPTO's record, it's real, and the clock is running.

Do the deadline math today

The response period is three months from the issue date shown on the Office Action. Not from the day you opened the email.

You can buy one three-month extension. The USPTO fee is $125. Two rules trip people up:

  • The extension request has to be filed on or before the original deadline.
  • It has to be filed before you file any response. Once you respond, you can't go back and ask for more time.

The extension never takes you past six months from the issue date. If your application came through the international Madrid system under Section 66(a), the rules are different: six months, with no extension.

Here's a simple example. An Office Action issued March 10 is due June 10. With the extension, it's due September 10. That's the last day, and the USPTO tells applicants not to wait until then.

Figure out which kind of letter you have

Office Actions come in two broad types, and the type decides almost everything about cost and odds. I covered both in depth in the article on Office Action responses, so here's the short version for a self-filer.

Procedural requirements. The examining attorney wants something fixed or clarified. Common ones on self-filed applications:

  • The description of goods or services is too vague or too broad.
  • A word in the mark describes what you sell and needs a disclaimer.
  • The owner's entity type or address needs clarifying.

These usually don't need legal argument. They do need care, because the answer becomes part of your application.

Substantive refusals. The examining attorney is refusing the mark itself. The big ones are likelihood of confusion with another mark, a finding that the mark is merely descriptive, and a specimen that doesn't show the mark in use. Answering one of these takes a written legal argument with evidence.

Many Office Actions have both. Read the whole letter. Each issue has to be answered, and a response that fixes three issues but skips the fourth is incomplete.

The mistakes I see in self-written responses

Self-filers often write back the way they'd write to a customer. That's understandable, and it's where responses go wrong.

Arguing feelings instead of the law. "We've used this name for years and nobody has ever been confused" isn't a legal answer to a likelihood of confusion refusal. The examining attorney applies a set of factors from case law. A response has to engage with those factors.

Admitting the problem. I've read responses that described the goods in a way that made them sound even closer to the cited registration. Everything you file stays in the record.

Fixing what can't be fixed. Some errors can't be corrected by amendment. A description of goods can be clarified or narrowed, but never broadened. An application filed by the wrong owner can't be saved by switching the owner. If either of those is the real problem, a response won't solve it. I explained both in the article on where DIY applications go wrong.

Missing an issue. If one issue goes unanswered, the application can still go abandoned.

Can you answer it yourself?

If you're domiciled in the US, yes. Nothing requires you to hire a lawyer to respond, and a clean procedural fix is something many owners handle on their own.

The honest picture on odds is this. In the study by Gerhardt and McClanahan at the University of North Carolina, applications filed by attorneys were approved about 82% of the time, compared with about 60% for self-filed ones. The gap isn't about the form. It's about the decisions inside the form, and an Office Action is where those decisions get tested.

A reasonable rule of thumb: if the letter only asks for a clarification and you understand exactly what it wants, you can likely handle it. If it says "refusal," or you're not sure what it's asking, get the letter read before you answer it.

What it costs to bring in a lawyer now

You don't have to refile or start over to get help. An attorney can become the attorney of record on your existing application and answer the letter on file. Your filing date stays the same.

At Citrus Legal, I answer Office Actions on applications filed anywhere, including ones people filed themselves or through a filing service. Procedural responses start at $425. Substantive responses start at $1,600. Both are flat fees, quoted in writing after I read the letter, before you pay anything. I'm the only attorney, and nothing is outsourced.

If you'd rather start fresh on a new name, a single mark from search to filing is $2,600 flat, or three payments of $950, plus the USPTO fee. Every application I've filed for a client so far has been approved, with zero refusals.

The week-one checklist

  1. Confirm the Office Action on the USPTO's own record.
  2. Write down the issue date and the three-month deadline.
  3. List every issue the letter raises.
  4. Decide whether each one is a fix or a refusal.
  5. If you need more time, file the extension before you file anything else.
  6. If anything says "refusal," get it reviewed while you still have most of the clock.

If you have an Office Action on an application you filed yourself, you can see how I handle them on the Office Action response page, and if you're starting over with a new name, the start page explains how a new filing works.

Questions about your name? Email us at hello@citrus.legal, or book a paid 30-minute consultation (opens in a new tab) for advice on your specific situation.

Sources

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

When you are ready to own it

One mark. One flat fee. One attorney.

The search, the written opinion, the federal application and procedural Office Actions, for $2,600 or three payments of $950. Nothing is filed until you approve the search. If I call your mark low risk and the USPTO refuses it, I file again at no attorney fee.

Start hereProtecting more than one mark? See every price

Not open yet? Start with the startups page.

Start here