Start here
The Zest

Are LegalZoom's trademark attorneys real attorneys? Who actually touches your application

Written by

Yes. LegalZoom's trademark registration package is handled by LZ Legal Services, a law firm LegalZoom owns, and the people who work there as trademark attorneys are licensed lawyers. What the sales page doesn't tell you is which attorney will work on your mark, how much time they'll spend on it, or what they'll do if the USPTO pushes back.

That second part is what matters when you're about to pay. So here's what LegalZoom says about its own service, in its own words, and how you can check who actually touched your application.

Is LegalZoom's trademark service handled by real attorneys or just software?

Both, depending on what you buy.

LegalZoom describes itself in the footer of its trademark page as "not a law firm," except where it works through its subsidiary law firm, LZ Legal Services, LLC. The same footer says LegalZoom "provides access to independent attorneys and self-service tools." So under one brand there's software, there's a network of outside attorneys, and there's an owned law firm.

The trademark registration package sits with the owned law firm. LegalZoom's comparison article says you'll "work directly with an attorney from our fully owned law firm, LZ Legal Services." The trademark page calls it a "fully owned law firm specializing in online trademark services."

LZ Legal Services is licensed by the Arizona Supreme Court as an alternative business structure, license number 70123. That's a program Arizona started in 2020 that lets a company owned by non-lawyers own a law firm. When LegalZoom got the license in 2021, the point reported at the time was that it could hire attorneys as employees instead of relying only on outside lawyers under contract.

The search is a different story. LegalZoom also sells standalone searches, and on that page the company describes the work as "we search all relevant trademark databases." A search report and an attorney's opinion about that report aren't the same product. If you buy a search without the registration package, read which one you're getting.

Are LegalZoom trademark attorneys experienced, or just paralegals reviewing forms?

I can't see inside LZ Legal Services, and I won't guess. Here's what's public.

A job posting from LZ Legal Services for a trademark attorney asked for experience with "high-volume U.S. trademark prosecution, clearance searching and opinions," Office Action responses and client calls, plus a law license in good standing. The posting said the firm had filed more than 50,000 trademark applications. LegalZoom's own article puts the brand's total at more than 400,000. The posting doesn't mention paralegals either way.

So the attorneys are trained for this work, and they work at volume. Volume isn't a bad thing on its own. It does mean your file is one of many, and the package is built around a defined set of steps. What the package doesn't promise is the same attorney from start to finish, or a named attorney before you pay. Neither the trademark page nor the comparison article names one.

There's also an inconsistency worth knowing about. The comparison article's FAQ says LegalZoom "works with in-house trademark attorneys," while the site footer talks about "independent attorneys." Both can be true at once, because they describe different products. But if you're buying something other than the registration package, such as an Office Action response through a legal plan, ask which kind of attorney you'll get. LegalZoom's Office Action page describes "an independent attorney," and says any arrangement "is strictly between you and them."

Does LegalZoom have real five-star reviews for trademark service, or are they fake?

I have no evidence that LegalZoom's reviews are fake, and I'm not going to suggest they are. Since 2024, a Federal Trade Commission rule has banned fake reviews, bought reviews and undisclosed insider reviews outright, so any company doing that faces real penalties.

The more useful question is what a five-star review is measuring. Most reviews get written right after checkout, when the questionnaire was easy and the application went in fast. The part that decides whether you own a registration usually comes months later, when a USPTO examining attorney reviews the application. I wrote more about reading those reviews in the article on LegalZoom trademark reviews.

LegalZoom's own success claims deserve the same close read. Its comparison article says LZ Legal Services has an "85% success rate" when you count the free second application, without saying how success is measured. A footnote on the trademark page says one success figure is "based on two trademark applications filed." That's a reason to ask what the number means, not a reason to assume it's wrong.

How to check who actually filed your application

You don't have to take anyone's word for this, mine included.

  1. Look up the record. Every application has a public file in the USPTO's TSDR system. Search your serial number and look at the attorney of record and correspondence details.
  2. Check the bar number. The USPTO tells applicants to ask for the attorney's bar number and confirm it with that state's bar. Only US-licensed attorneys can give you legal advice or represent you there, and the USPTO says "agents" and "specialists" don't count.
  3. Ask who handles problems. Ask whether the same attorney will answer an Office Action, and whether that response is included or quoted separately.

If an answer comes back vague, that tells you something too. The article on choosing a trademark attorney has more questions to ask anyone, including me.

How I do it, for comparison

I'm one attorney. I run every search myself, write every opinion, prepare and file every application, and take every call. Nothing gets handed off or outsourced. You know my name before you pay, and it's my name on the USPTO record after.

That costs more than LegalZoom. One mark is $2,600 flat, or three payments of $950, and that covers the search, my written opinion, the federal application and procedural Office Actions. The USPTO fee is separate, at $350 per class. Every application I've filed has been approved so far, with zero refusals. If my opinion rates a mark low risk and the USPTO refuses it anyway, I file a new application at no attorney fee, and you pay only the USPTO fee.

Is having a lawyer worth it at all? The best research I know of says it changes outcomes. A study of more than five million USPTO applications by Deborah Gerhardt and Jon McClanahan found that about 82% of attorney-filed applications reached publication, compared with about 60% of applications filed without one. Publication is the USPTO's preliminary approval. That study compared attorneys with non-attorneys, not one company with another, so it can't tell you whether any particular firm beats another.

If you'd like one attorney you can name to handle your search, opinion and filing for one flat fee, see how to start.

Questions about your name? Email us at hello@citrus.legal, or book a paid 30-minute consultation (opens in a new tab) for advice on your specific situation.

Sources

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

When you are ready to own it

One mark. One flat fee. One attorney.

The search, the written opinion, the federal application and procedural Office Actions, for $2,600 or three payments of $950. Nothing is filed until you approve the search. If I call your mark low risk and the USPTO refuses it, I file again at no attorney fee.

Start hereProtecting more than one mark? See every price

Not open yet? Start with the startups page.

Start here