Start here
The Zest

Another gym has your name in another state: who wins?

Written by

It comes down to two dates and one map. If neither gym has a federal registration, each one owns the name only where it actually does business. Once one of you files federally and the registration issues, that owner gets nationwide priority from the filing date, except against a gym that was already using the name before that filing. That earlier gym keeps its home turf and nothing more.

Rights start with use, and they start local

The Supreme Court laid the groundwork in 1918 in a case about a drug brand called "Rex" that two companies used in two different cities. The Court said "the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption," and that "there is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business." The Massachusetts company that used Rex first couldn't stop a Louisville company that had adopted Rex in good faith and built a local trade before the first company got there.

For gyms, that means a studio in DTSP and a studio in Denver with the same name can each have common-law rights in their own market, without either one filing anything. I went deeper on what unregistered rights do and don't cover in the article on prior user rights.

What a federal registration changes

A federal registration does two things the common law can't.

First, it reaches back to the filing date and covers the whole country. The statute says that, once the mark is registered, "the filing of the application to register such mark shall constitute constructive use of the mark, conferring a right of priority, nationwide in effect." The exception is anyone who used the mark before that filing date and hasn't abandoned it.

Second, it puts everyone on notice. Registration "shall be constructive notice of the registrant's claim of ownership." After that, a new gym can't say it didn't know.

Here is the part that surprises people. Nationwide priority doesn't mean the registered gym can shut down a distant gym tomorrow. In a 1959 case involving Dawn Donut, the Second Circuit held that "the registrant may enjoin only that concurrent use which creates a likelihood of public confusion." Because the registrant had "no present prospect" of expanding into the other company's area, there was no confusion and no injunction. But the court said the registrant could come back "upon a proper showing of an intent to use the mark" in that market. The registration waits. It doesn't expire just because you're far apart.

Four ways this plays out

  1. Neither gym has filed. Each owns the name where it operates. The first to file and register gets nationwide priority from its filing date, carved out around the other gym's existing area.
  2. They filed first, and you opened after their filing date. You have no prior-use carve-out. Once they're in your market or show they're headed there, they can ask a court to stop you. If you apply, the USPTO can refuse your mark as likely to cause confusion with their registration.
  3. You were open before their filing date. The statute gives you a defense if you adopted the name "without knowledge of the registrant's prior use" and used it continuously from before their constructive use date. That defense applies "only for the area in which such continuous prior use is proved." You keep your city. You can't grow into theirs, or into the rest of the country they now hold.
  4. You filed first. Flip number 3. They keep whatever area they can prove they were using it in before your filing date, and you hold the rest.

The defense in number 3 survives even against a registration that has become incontestable. The statute lists it among the defenses an incontestable registration is still subject to.

Getting your own registration as the earlier user

If you're the earlier gym in scenario 3, you're not shut out of the federal register. The statute allows the USPTO to issue "concurrent registrations" when confusion isn't likely because of conditions on "the mode or place of use," for parties who built rights through "concurrent lawful use in commerce" before the other side's filing date.

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decides these in a concurrent use proceeding. Its manual says the applicant "normally must assert a date of first use in commerce prior to the earliest application filing date" of the other party, and that "this requirement is jurisdictional in nature." Restrictions "are generally to claimed geographic areas of use." The applicant carries "the burden of proving entitlement." A court decision finding that both parties are entitled to use the name can also support a concurrent registration.

So the result is two registrations for one name, each limited to its own territory.

What this means for your gym

Your first-use date is the most valuable fact you have. Keep the proof: your opening date, your first ads, your first membership sales under the name.

Then look at the other gym's dates. Did they file federally? When? Was your gym open before that date? Where do they operate, and where do you? Those answers tell you which of the four scenarios you're in. Keep in mind that a Florida state registration and a federal registration are different things, and only the federal one carries the nationwide filing-date priority described above. I explained the difference in the article on Florida and federal trademarks.

And if you plan to open a second location or sell online programs nationally, the map matters more. A prior-use defense protects where you were, not where you're going. If you just found out someone is using your name, this article on what to do first walks through the next steps.

If you want to talk through where your gym stands before you file, you can see how the search and filing packages work on the services page, and the FAQs page answers most of what comes up before a first call.

Book a free 15-minute discovery call with the attorney (opens in a new tab)

(No legal advice is given on the discovery call. It's a chance to tell me what you're building and hear how the process works.)

Sources

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Start here